Working in Partnership

Question: Describe about the Essay for Working in Partnership? Answer: Introduction This report is primarily concerned with the Working in Partnership in the Health and Social Care. It is considered as the most effective and efficient way to deliver service to the service users. Service are already in vulnerable condition, so it is the sole responsibility of the caregivers and health professionals to provide them utmost care and superior level of service (Addicott, 2009). It is the embracing strategy for successful delivery of service. Employees in the health care organization should work as a team. In partnership working, two or more than two people are engaged with the common interest. While working in partnership, employees should have faith and trust on each other (Weinstein et al., 2013). Working in partnership is actually a shared responsibility with the intention of delivering superior level of quality service to the patients and family members of patients. Understand partnership philosophies and relationships in health and social care services Explain the philosophy of working in partnership in health and social care There are six different philosophies in the health and social care partnership working. These six philosophies are acknowledged and aspired as the ultimate philosophies for the health and social care. At first, in the health care sectors Autonomy is conceptualized where caregivers can take their own decision while giving service to the particular one (Carnwell, et al, 2009). They are the decision maker of the service user but recently due to the complexity of disease and complexity of treatment procedures, health care professionals have to take decision after consulting with the other service users. According to Soothill (2005), the philosophy of working in partnership in health and social care is based on set of values and beliefs. Caregivers have to learn how they should behave with the co-workers of the other organizations and agencies (Edwards, 2005). The procedures of working in partnership refer to the working with the other health care organizations or other healthcare agencie s to provide utmost support to the service users. Mutual supportive partnership develops with the service users. Due to the blessing of internet, people are getting aware of the treatment procedures, in short they become autonomous; so they have knowledge regarding their disease and they take decision based on their knowledge. Health care professionals or caregivers should not divert or confuse the employees, regarding the treatment procedures (Glasby Dickinson, 2008). Patients and family members of patients can able to make decision based on the findings and information. Before, the health care sector had full domain on the condition of the patients, they can manipulate the choices of patients but now they are unable to do so. Transparency in the health care setting helps to enhance the quality of service (Timor-Shlevin Krumer-Nevo, 2015). There are several philosophies, which are related to the working in partnership in health care setting, the philosophies are: Philosophy of empowerment: The meaning of empowerment is to share the power with someone who is lack in power. Power from the colleagues or from the external agencies will help the weaker person to improve his or her abilities. It is a process of enhancing the abilities of the people so that they can able to solve their own problems. This ability will help them to understand they even they have ability take decision and besides, this helps to enhance the self-confident. People start feeling that they can control the own problems and they have power to take own decision (Glasby Dickinson, 2009). If a caregiver can able to take decision for the company then the caregiver will definitely feel confident and this will enhance his or her satisfaction level. Philosophy of Independence: Independence facilities the individual to take their own decision; independence is the exact opposite of dependence. Independence is considered as the personal characteristics, ability, self-autonomy and control (Glasby Peck, 2004). Philosophy of Autonomy: If an individual tries to act on self-interest then the individual should have freedom. This individual freedom is known as the autonomy (Hunter Perkins, 2014). Personal autonomy is u7nderstood as the ability, which helps individual to change the resources and environment of the organization according to the self-interest. Philosophy of Respect Respect is the integral part of every organization; due to lack of respect people do not want to work even (Jelphs Dickinson, 2008). Main function of respect is to protect the individuality and autonomy of the service users. Service users are provided with all the necessary documents and details of the treatment procedures. Service users are asked to take their own decision. Healthcare professionals should respect the belief and values of the patients. Philosophy of Power-Sharing Every employee in the health care organization has certain goals and individual is entitled to accomplish the goal (Mackenzie, 2009). Collaborative partnership will help the employees to share the knowledge with the other so that they can understand the organizational goals. Philosophy of Informed Choices While taking any decision, people want to access the information easily. To take better decision for the welfare of the organization, it is necessary to collect quality information. Philosophies are not helping the people to teach them how they should behave with the co-workers and service users, philosophies are basically the framework for understand the ethical dilemmas (Manthorpe, 2008). In several situations, health care professionals have to face difficulties while taking the right decision, in that case, these philosophies help them to mitigate the risk in the setting and work mutually. Evaluate partnership relationships within health and social care services While working in the health care setting as the medical professional, it is the duty of the medical practitioners to behave well with everyone. Patients from different ages are coming to avail treatment like children, male, female and elderly person, all are in vulnerable condition. Support workers have to deal with them; patients come from different countries and communities so they medical practitioners have to deal with them fairly (Odle, 2008). Good partnership working facilitates in building strong and effective relationship with the co-workers and service users. Multi-disciplinary team is working in the organization and it is necessary to retain a good relation with all of them (Soni, 2014). In that case, communication is the best procedure. Working n partnership definitely has positive impact of the treatment procedures and the welfare of the patients so UK Governing Body is major step to implement the policy of working in partnerships (Snape Taylor, 2004). There are some constraints, which are working as hindrances like increase in population, high level of fiscal policy, high level of monetary policies, treatment awareness and changes in requirements of the vulnerable people, who are suffering from mental and physical needs. On the other hand, recently UK government has noticed that UK people are heavily suffering from the illness and low level of care. People from the poor and low class cannot afford medical treatment due to the increased price of the health care system ("Partnership in nursing care (PINC): the Blackburn model", 2001). Besides, professionals in the health care setting are incapable of recognizing the disease. They fail to identify the risk earlier; from the examples of several cases, it is clear that due to lack of preventive care people are suffering. From the report of the Mid Staffordshire NHS Trust, the case of Victoria Climbie has gained medical attention for delivering poor service. This case is the perfect example of awful partnership in health care setting. This case is the consequence of low level of partnership among the employees, agencies and professionals. After this incident, UK government put emphasis on the importance of effecting partnership working so that health care organizations can deliver service that is more effective and provide support to the patients. Health care organizations should form strategic partnership with the NHS trust and other organizations in UK. In the case of the Victoria Climbie Case, she had died due to the negligence of doctors, social workers and staffs; even a police officer included in the negligence. There were failed to identify the mark of intentional harm on the body of Victoria. Even the lack of system was also responsible behind the death of the Victoria; the error in system failure cannot not be forgiven. The death of Toddler in Sheffield Childrens Hospital, UK is another example of careless attitude of the medical practitioners. Complete failure communication between was the prime reason behind the death of the two years boy. After vomiting blood, Tharun had sent for three endoscopies still the doctors could not able to identify the disease, Dr. Campbell discharged him from the hospital but after one day, he stated vomiting blood again. Many other doctors are stated that he could be safe after a life-saving operation but due to lack of collaboration between the surgeons and Gastro-enterologists, the child has to lose his life ("Boy, two, bled to death in hospital after a complete failure of communication between doctors, inquest hears", 2013). Conclusion From the above two case study, it is clear that communication and partnership in the health care organization play an integral role. In both case, victims are died due to failure of communication and partnership. Working is Partnership is formed with the aim of providing better service to the service users. A successful partnership can only be formed with the help of the effective communication among the professionals (Soothill, Mackay Webb, 2005). There are several benefits that can be derived from the Working in partnership and these benefits are for the both service users and service providers. References Addicott, R. (2009). Better Partnership Working Complete Set. Health Social Care In The Community, 17(5), 532-533. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00883_3.x Boy, two, bled to death in hospital after a complete failure of communication between doctors, inquest hears. (2013). Mail Online. Retrieved 27 March 2016, from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2286012/Toddler-bleeds-death-complete-failure-communication-doctors.html Carnwell, R., Buchanan, J., Carnwell, R. (2009). Effective practice in health, social care and criminal justice. Maidenhead: McGraw Hill/Open University Press. Edwards, K. (2005). Partnership working in mental health care. Edinburgh: Elsevier Churchill Livingstone. Glasby, J., Dickinson, H. (2008). Partnership working in health and social care. Bristol [England]: Policy Press in association with Community Care. Glasby, J., Dickinson, H. (2009). International perspectives on health and social care. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell/CAIPE. Glasby, J., Dickinson, H. (2009). International perspectives on health and social care. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley-Blackwell/CAIPE. Glasby, J., Peck, E. (2004). Care trusts. Abingdon, U.K.: Radcliffe Medical Press. Hunter, D., Perkins, N. (2014). Partnership working in public health. Bristol: Policy Press. Jelphs, K., Dickinson, H. (2008). Working in teams. Bristol [England]: Policy Press in association with Community Care. Mackenzie, G. (2009). Effective Practice in Health, Social Care and Criminal Justice: A Partnership Approach. Health Social Care In The Community, 18(1), 115-116. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2524.2009.00898_10.x Manthorpe, J. (2008). Partnership Working in Health and Social Care. Journal Of Interprofessional Care, 22(5), 560-561. https://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13561820802239355 Odle, K. (2008). In My Opinion...Partnership for Family-Centered Care: Reality or Fantasy?. Children's Health Care, 17(2), 85-86. https://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326888chc1702_4 Partnership in nursing care (PINC): the Blackburn model. (2001). Journal Of Child Health Care, 5(1), 35-38. https://dx.doi.org/10.1177/136749350100500106 Snape, S., Taylor, P. (2004). Partnerships Between Health and Local Government. Taylor Francis. Soni, H. (2014). Partnership Working in Health and Social Care Glasby Jon and Dickinson Helen Partnership Working in Health and Social Care128pp 9.99 Policy Press 9781447312819 1447312813. Nursing Management, 21(8), 12-12. https://dx.doi.org/10.7748/nm.21.8.12.s14 Soothill, K., Mackay, L., Webb, C. (2005). Interprofessional relations in health care. London: E. Arnold. Timor-Shlevin, S., Krumer-Nevo, M. (2015). Partnership-based practice with young people: relational dimensions of partnership in a therapeutic setting. Health Soc Care Community, n/a-n/a. https://dx.doi.org/10.1111/hsc.12227 Weinstein, L., LaNoue, M., Plumb, J., King, H., Stein, B., Tsemberis, S. (2013). A Primary Care-Public Health Partnership Addressing Homelessness, Serious Mental Illness, and Health Disparities. The Journal Of The American Board Of Family Medicine, 26(3), 279-287. https://dx.doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2013.03.120239